Harry potter and nude emma watson, emma louise roberts, pictures of emma watson breast,

Gps · Guest

I think he just wants a place to stay post the credit crunch. So he pleaded guilty, plus he's a PC, so jails are rather homely anyway.
You made a bet against all available data and you're surprised that you lost?

Tiffany · Guest

“You know you've hit bottom when you're found naked, clinging to a fence in North Dakota.

Sanimah · Guest

Just wait for AMD Fusion..
OK folks, I'm an actual astronomer specializing in galaxy dynamics, so let me break this down for you. MOND was introduced to account for flat galaxy rotation curves in the absence of dark matter, at which it was very successful. However, MOND has failed to properly account for the motions of clusters of galaxies, while the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) theory offers a better fit to the data. In addition, contrary to what is sometimes assumed, LCDM has made a number of predictions that have now been verified. The density of dark matter haloes in the outer regions has been found to be consistent with LCDM. In addition, simulations of the large scale structure of the universe display a pattern of voids and clumps strung together by filaments of dark matter, along which a large number of galaxies are expected to lie. This has been observed - galaxies do appear to lie along filaments. And of course, there's the bullet cluster and gravitational lensing.Here's MOND's real problem: it was intended to be a very simple theory (one free parameter) that could account for observed galaxy dynamics. However, you need to keep changing it and adding more free parameters to account for the other stuff that dark matter explains naturally. What's more, there's no reason to actually think that gravity must be modified as MOND states - it's purely ad hoc. However, there are a number of well-motivated candidates for what might constitute dark matter, namely axions, WIMPS, etc, all of which have been postulated for decades by particle physicists independent of the dark matter hypothesis.So now, you have a theory that want to make an ad hoc modification to the law of gravity to fit the data and that requires a bunch of extra parameters to make it work right, or you can explain all this stuff with dark matter naturally without having to change the laws of physics. We can't see it, but we have a good idea what it has to be made up of.Do you see now why most astronomers don't take MOND very seriously?!

Tom · Guest

I think you might be taking things way too seriously. 2012 is just some innocent fun, I don't think anyone (particularly the makers of this movie) think it's for real.?
This is absolutely no surprise to anyone who's spent any meaningful time in the field. *All* code contains terrible errors-- this is the assumption we all make at all times-- or at least we used to before clueless middle management started telling everyone to not talk so much about the problems, and focus on the positive.So we all focused on the positive, and now all your data is wide open and it is very, very easy to steal. How can this be fixed?It can't. Keep anything you care about the hell out of "the cloud", and check the integrity of your data regularly. It's about the best you can do.

Muhedin · Guest

GOP men do not respect women or believe them their equals. Disgraceful behavior.

Duncan · Guest

If the prices of iPhones are dropping then Droid is already a good thing!

Ally · Guest

No soda is good unless its made with Pure Cane Sugar. ***** high fructose corn syrup!

Ashenfin · Guest

!

emma watson party pics